On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:29:39 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 29, 12:27*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
The Honduran Supreme Court removed their president in accord with
legal procedure and the dictates of their constitution because the
President was in violation of the law and the constitution. *However,
Obama, Chavez, and Castro refuse to recognize the new president. *The
Honduran president was attempting to institute a vote to allow himself
to remain president but the constitution did not give this authority.
Instead, he ordered ballots from Chavez but the army on orders from
the Supreme Court *took control of the ballots as provided for in the
constitution. *The presidents men broke in the are where the ballots
were held and were trying to instate a referendum in violation of the
constitution and the courts.
Thus, Obama is clearly in favor of a govt outside the rule of law and
constitutional authority. *He has clearly sided with extremist
dictators. *Does this bode well for an election in 2012? *Start buying
ammo now.

Your morning contribution to the "Are you as stupid as frogwatch?" saga?
Good start.

More proof, Dems can't think

Wow, that's a pretty wide brush you're wielding.

That doesn't speak so well of the Reptilians since the Dems thought
well enough to get elected into a wide majority.

Were the R's brains sidelined because of injury?