On Jun 10, 11:20*pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:07:13 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Jun 10, 10:36*pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:32:09 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

For the barbed-wire wrapped around the broom handle treatment?

This is what we get to look forward to.

I know, I know it's almost a 60-day old article, but what-the-hay....

http://www.atr.org/il-governor-quinn...se-taxes-a3037

Legislature killed that, I think.

for the moment.

Besides, I don't think the rate increases in that link are right.
I read elsewhere Quinn planned to sock the $+100k income crowd.
Not sure though.
I'm not up on state tax rates, but was pleased when Illinois didn't
tax some retirement money I took from my IRA.
Just found out this year they don't tax that.
A much wealthier friend is happy about that too, and seemed to imply
it's unusual for an "income tax" state.
I didn't really look into it. *Scared.

--Vic

Vic, you notice it seems like every political suit wants to tax people
of 100K or over?

oncerning the link tax percentages, you could be correct, but it seems
like the rules (and figguh's) can change at no given notice.


so....