jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:18:58 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

GC Boater wrote:
It's been time for decades to wean american males off their overpowered
penis substitutes in cars and boats.- Hide quoted text -

Penis substitutes? Would that explain the Hatteras and the Zimerman-
like lobster boat?

He said the same thing about people who owned handguns.
I said that people who owned handguns were more likely to take their
own lives. Do you fit that description?
Two points:
1. I was not discussing you or even talking to you, I was discussing
the person who stated those who owned handguns were using them due to
them having a very small penis. You might have said, it, but I never
heard you say it, Harry said it everyday, till the day he purchased a
handgun.
2. I don't own a handgun, never have. I have no problem if handguns
have increased regulations or completely banned. I really don't have a
problem if we leave the law the way it is. I completely agree that in
most cases handguns are used against the handgun owner (by a criminal
who takes the gun away from them), or they use the gun to kill
themselves. Based upon Harry's behavior, and I would think the odds are
he will eventually use his handgun to harm himself, or he will go postal
at the local mall, but I don't think banning guns will result in
criminals or mentally unstable individuals turning in their handguns.
It will just make selling them very profitable for organized crime.

Lefties aren't the ones who go postal. We realize we can't control
everything arounds us, unlike righties.

Good for you that you're not among the paranoid nuts, at least on this
subject.


I'm so honored to be the object of desire of rec.boats' ****heads like
Reggie, Loogie, floridajim, et cetera.