Thread: I blame Scot...
View Single Post
  #124   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Richard Casady Richard Casady is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 2,587
Default I blame Scot...

On Sat, 30 May 2009 08:32:29 -0400, HK wrote:

Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 16:21:17 -0700, jps wrote:

I'm a big fan of get home power so I'm far more attracted to twin
engines. Working on a blazing hot engine in a small space isn't my
idea of pleasure boating


You don't know what a hot engine is. Sprint car headers glow in the
dark, hotter than red not.

Casady



So did the new tubular exhaust headers of my TR4A and Lotus Cortina way
back in the 1960s when we strapped the cars on the dyno to see how much
the horsepower was boosted by new Webers, intake manifolds, headers,
exhausts, cams, et cetera. The shop had big floor fans to help dissipate
the heat. The TR4 was a great little sports car, by the way. The Lotus
Cortina had reliability problems. Both were bought new.

Working below decks on a hot boat engine is mechanical hell. At least
the auto engines are transmitting their heat to either the outdoors or a
large indoor space such as a service bay.


Good point. My fast answer is a twenty inch box fan from Wal-Mart,
with a small cheap inverter. You blow it on the mill as long as you
can put it off, and then it blows on you. Technically, you don't have
to cool the mill totally, just the outer skin that is radiating the
IR. Hard to figure how that would work out. The water cooled exhaust
must help a lot compared to a car. The family bought a Turbocraft in
the fifties. Hull number 10, of the first jetboats ever sold in the
us. It had a flathead six with a doghouse with two latches. Ten
seconds work and the motor is 90% exposed. Two minutes to change the
plugs. Two hours for the Navigator. Why does a truck need four cams?

Casady

Casady