HK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:13:22 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:56:55 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:43:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads
etc and as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and
need to be slap upside the head, but that is just you doing you
civic duty. Is that correct?
You don't post anything that isn't a buttsniff.
You're like a dog that's only mission in life is to annoy other dogs
by cramming your nose into their anus for a good whiff.

Is that your civic duty?
No, I have been asking you a simple question, you seem to be the
one sniffing very strongly behind me. Would it be better if I did
nothing but hurl 5th grade expletives towards anyone I disagree
with, and ignore the obnoxious behavior of those I agree with?
You don't understand the concept. You add nothing to the dialogue.

You don't field arguments about anything. Vapid, void, empty. You
pursue a hobby of buttsniffing.

You do your little netcop thing if it floats your boat.

Would you like a badge and little hat to wear? I'm happy to go down
to the Toys R Us and grab 'em for you.

I don't care about your real name, just provide your address and I'll
get 'em on the way tomorrow.
jps,

I think you need to go back and read this thread, you have become
totally confused or are having a serous senior moment. You are the
person who was the Netcop, chastising someone for discussing a
subject you thought was inappropriate for the newsgroup. I just
repeated your statement back to you, to highlight how foolish it was,
because that is Harry's MO on 99% of his post, and your MO on over
50% of your post.

Now if you think you are actually having a dialogue, you are
completely delusional. Throwing out a long line of expletives, with
an occasional high 5 to Harry is not the definition of a dialogue.
Using your definition of "butt sniffing" what you are doing is butt
sniffing most of the other dogs in rec.boats. I don't think many
would consider your posts anything but vapid, void and empty
outburst, similar to what one might see from a downtown street corner
preacher or psychotic.

It is possible that you don't understand the definition of dialogue,
so here is the definition of dialogue as it relates to this
discussion: "an exchange of ideas or opinions on a particular issue,
esp. a political or religious issue, with a view to reaching an
amicable agreement or settlement." With the exception of few
individuals, there are very few dialogues in rec.boats. Mostly we
have insults and name calling and chest pounding.

Now I have tried to have a dialogue with you in this thread, but you
seem to intent to divert the dialogue back to what you are
comfortable with, a series of insults.

You're wasting your time.


Actually, buttsniffing *is* "Reggie's" ricebowl here. He certainly has
nothing to add to any dialogue.

Harry,
Speaking of vapid, void and empty outburst, how are you doing?

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects