On Wed, 13 May 2009 14:54:09 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

"Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, a
Democrat, backed Pelosi.

"I think it's a tempest in a teapot really to say: Well, Speaker
Pelosi should have known all of this, she should have stopped this,
she should have done this or done that," she said.

"I don't want to make an apology for anybody, but in 2002, it wasn't
2006, 07, 08 or 09. It was right after 9/11, and there were in fact
discussions about a second wave of attacks."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...VxU83hIkPgSq7w

What's even more interesting is that some Democrats and liberal
commentators are begining to get a clue becasue some of their leaders
were in on the intelligence - including Feinstien. Cheney has
indicated that these methods stopped two major attacks - one that was
directed at SoCal and DNI Dennis Blair and the CIA have corroborated
that in general terms - no specifics.

Pelosi lied to keep her left-wing support in place by lying about it.
Feinstein tried to defend Pelosi, but this may wind up damaging both
of them among the MoveOn/International ANSWER wing of the Democratic
Party.

Watch this to die out quickly and it probably won't be prosecuted in
any sense of the word - otherwise, we'd have an empty Congress.

"What's even more interesting is that some Democrats and liberal
commentators are begining to get a clue..."

Therein you have the difference. Those on the left are willing to
speak up. If this was coming from the right, the minions of right
leaning commentators would line up right behind the scumbag.