Questions for Eisboch
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			Eisboch wrote: 
  
 "thunder"  wrote in message  
   t... 
 On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:50:23 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: 
 
 
 1 - The "dirty hands" dilemma which is really a cost/benefit analysis. 
 The usual circumstances are the "ticking bomb" scenario in which a bomb 
 is set to go off and kill thousands of people  - the cost of harming one 
 human life to save thousands of human lives is defensible and/or 
 excusable. This argument basically states that while morally 
 indefensible, the end result justifies the means. 
 
 If, in truth, there were a "ticking bomb", the torture argument does 
 become hazier, but the reality is that scenario is extremely rare, and 
 doesn't apply in this case.  This was torture used for plain old 
 "ordinary" intelligence.  When you put people in a violent situation, 
 there will be torture, and illegal killings.  That can be put down as 
 "**** happens", but when you allow torture as policy, you place this 
 country on the same level as Pinochet's Chile, Stalin's Soviet Union, 
 Hitler's Germany... 
 
  
 To me, it isn't whether torture works or not, it's about what it says 
 about us.  We're ****in' barbarians. 
  
  
  
 Tell me. 
  
 Are we as barbaric as a society who beheads innocent people and posts  
 the video on the internet for all to see including the family of the  
 victims? 
 Are we as barbaric as a group who sneak into the USA, hijack airplanes  
 and fly them into buildings in downtown NY city, killing about 3000? 
 Are we as barbaric as a group who instill  lifelong hatred into 6 year  
 old kids and promote the killing of the "infidels" as a religious honor  
 and duty? 
  
 And that's not considering how they treat their own who don't obey. 
  
 Sorry.  I have no sympathy for them. 
  
 Eisboch 
  
  
 
 
1. Since we still have capital punishment in this country, and in many  
cases it is painful to the victim, I'm not sure we are on high enough  
moral ground to bitch about the ways other societies execute their  
criminals or those they consider criminals. Also, we were involved in  
the trials that led to the execution of Saddam Hussein, and if you  
recall, videos of his hanging were on the news everywhere. We're at  
least guilty by association in that public display, even though it was  
carried out by our new warm friends and allies, the Iraqis. 
 
Also, don't forget that we are one of the only "modern" western  
countries that still has capital punishment, and that of all modern  
western countries, we imprison the highest percentage of our people. 
 
2. As horrific as 9-11 was to us, we have killed far more innocent  
Iraqis with our bombings of their cities, towns, and villages. We don't  
talk much in this country about the devastation we have caused to Iraq  
and Iraqis, a country and people who were virtually uninvolved in 9-11. 
 
3. We have thousands upon thousands of crazed conservative christians in  
this country who instill lifelong hatred into their children towards  
others in society (e.g., gays) who do not believe as they do, and  
sometimes those children go out and commit violence in the cause of  
their religious beliefs. We don't have as much of it as the Muslim  
world, but we have it. 
 
Your post ignores the fact that whatever high moral ground this country  
occupied was given up by the actions of the George W. Bush  
administration. We may not be down in the sewer with the fundie  
Islamists, but we certainly were taken right to the gutter. 
 
In short, the differences between the way the fundie Muslims abuse  
people and the way we do here are a matter of degree. 
 
The damage inflicted on this country by Bush and his crowd will plague  
us for generations. 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |