On May 11, 9:21*am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
om...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news:OeKdnYgATbSPFZrXnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink .com...
Eisboch wrote:
Interesting prospective on the UAW...
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1366...-giving-up-mor...
It is always fun to read the right-wingers' rationalizations as to
why the working man and woman should be paid ****, with no benefits.
Serfdom uber alles, eh?
Why is that?
Seems like when you cannot directly contradict or debate facts you
default to a generalized, "right-winger" attack.
Eisboch
There's no reason to "directly contradict" or "debate" right-wingers
because it would be the same as lying down with pigs in a pool of
pig**** and expecting to come out clean.
I read the article, and the conclusion is the same as all the other
right-wing articles that state that auto workers in this country
should work for peanuts. I especially liked the analogies between what
the auto worker earns and what physicians can earn - that was funny
stuff.
I'm sure I've told you about my Norwegian buddies who work the
offshore oil rigs and the supply boats. They make substantially less
than their U.S. counterparts, but they live very well, and seem a lot
happier than American works.
Why?
1. First class national health care plan.
2. First class retirement plan that provides a really decent retirement.