On Thu, 07 May 2009 13:41:05 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 7 May 2009 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 7, 2:07*pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 08:22:53 -0700, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 11:16:06 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 07:30:01 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 07 May 2009 06:21:11 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

about Bush bombing Afghan villages?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY

Now the Red Cross complains that Obama is just airraiding villages and
killing civilians.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...ITE=TNKNN&SECT...

But the antiwar movement isn’t showing the degree of moral
grandstanding that it showed when Bush was President.

How typical.

Sad - really, really sad dudes.

At least he's bombing the right country Tom.

Why is that.? We have never found a terrorist from Afghanistan. They
are mostly Saudis. But if we kill enough innocent Afghans we will
start seeing terrorists from there.

When is Obama going to honor his promise to stop the war?

He is starting to look like Nixon (who also ran on a promise to stop
the war and then expanded it)

Nixon did stop the war and so will Obama.

Are you in favor of Al Qaeda and the Taliban taking over Pakistan?

When I said "at least he's bombing the right country" it was meant as
tongue in cheek since our expectations of proper leadership have been
so eviscerated over the past eight years.

I stood against going into Afghanistan in the first place. *The SU
proved that doing so was a fools errand. *We need a surgical approach
to rooting out the lunatics who would love to get their hands on
Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

Would that be a good thing?

Obama doesn't aim the cruise missles, he set the agenda.

Gosh, how your tune changes.

Obama is the Commander in Chief. It's his fault.

Remember words along those lines?

The word 'hypocritical' comes to mind.

Flake.
--
John H

Funny how all the libs are becoming great apologists.

If Bush had half a brain, he'd have continued to focus on addressing
the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

We don't have that ****ing idiot in office any longer but through his
neglect the problems has gotten worse.

Thank goodness we have a level headed leader who'll focus on the
pivotal issues rather than illusory boogemen.

Anyone of you who'd like the Taliban to have control Pakistan's
nuclear weapons speak up now.

Or shut the **** up.

Yippee - It's still Bush's fault!

The Taliban problem in Pakistan is Obama's fault. Live with it.

"Level headed leader" is a pretty racist comment about Obama's
haircut. Why would you say that? If you're commenting on his
leadership abilities, remember that spending money does not make one a
leader.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm