On Tue, 5 May 2009 20:16:11 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 5 May 2009 19:45:09 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 05 May 2009 18:50:27 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk...os-leaked.html

I recognize this whole thing about gay marriage may have you a little
confused. Truth is, girls are still a lot more attractive topless
than dudes, but thanks for the very pc link to what you've found to be
an attractive topless babe.

I will not disparage your choice since I eagerly endorse that beauty
is indeed in the eye of the beholder-- but please consider the
possibility that this link is slightly more satisfying...

http://thedirty.com/?p=157850

From what I understand about recent additions, this is pre-plastic.


She's also a class act and a smart cookie. I like her ..... ummmm
style.

Eisboch

I don't understand why her high school classmates claim she's a skank
or why a modest Christian girl would want to pose for underware ads.

I think our definitions of smart cookie differ. She was smart enough
to take the free breast implants the pageant executives offered?

She was smart enough to set herself up as a spokesmodel for "not
opposite" marriage?

She was smart enough to make certain these photos of her wouldn't make
the press? If she poses for Playboy in a couple of years, will she
still be smart?

Your conservatism is leaking.

Eisboch

I do have traditional/conservative thoughts and freely admit it.

It's typical that "neo-conservatives" want to restrict what others do
but reserve all freedoms for themselves.

Fake morals, fake Christianity, fake tits purchased behind the scenes
to enhance her odds. Most of these Xtians would mistake Jesus for a
liberal socialist and scream for his deportation.