"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 May 2009 19:45:09 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 05 May 2009 18:50:27 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk...os-leaked.html

I recognize this whole thing about gay marriage may have you a little
confused. Truth is, girls are still a lot more attractive topless
than dudes, but thanks for the very pc link to what you've found to be
an attractive topless babe.

I will not disparage your choice since I eagerly endorse that beauty
is indeed in the eye of the beholder-- but please consider the
possibility that this link is slightly more satisfying...

http://thedirty.com/?p=157850

From what I understand about recent additions, this is pre-plastic.


She's also a class act and a smart cookie. I like her ..... ummmm
style.

Eisboch

I don't understand why her high school classmates claim she's a skank
or why a modest Christian girl would want to pose for underware ads.

I think our definitions of smart cookie differ. She was smart enough
to take the free breast implants the pageant executives offered?

She was smart enough to set herself up as a spokesmodel for "not
opposite" marriage?

She was smart enough to make certain these photos of her wouldn't make
the press? If she poses for Playboy in a couple of years, will she
still be smart?




Your conservatism is leaking.

Eisboch