An amusing day on the Erie Canal
On May 4, 1:40*pm, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 09:54:05 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote in
Yeah but those boats have a design that makes them easier to skull.
Long and narrow with a trailing end transom, vee bottom etc. I would
think the motor transom of those skiffs might make them harder to
skull, especially in any current or wind..
*skull* * Hehehehe.
What a frippin' idiot.
If you had something in your skull besides gas, you'd know the
difference between scull and skull.
*SKULL* * Sheeesh.
By their lame spelling flames you shall know them.
Casady
Nothing lame about it. As a self-proclaimed builder of rowboats, even an
intellectual cipher like JustHate should have known the word he wanted
was "scull," not "scull." I'm not expecting a high level of language
"dexterity" on usenet, but someone in "the boatbuilding biz" should be
familiar with its common terms.
*SKULL for SCULL*
Idiot.
Harry,
I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between the "scull" not
"scull". Surely someone as critical of others spelling, would be a
little more careful with his own. Eh!
You are a riot. How many years, in college, did you say it took them to
groom you to be a writer.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The Pink Army gets so caught up and full of drool when they think they
are being clever, they simply can't even wait to post... I can see
Hatin' Harrys little nubby fingers pounding away while eating a bucket
of KFC and getting grease all over the keyboard... You really don't
believe this story of him being a writer do you? He was more likely a
porter (janitor in union speak) in some shop, pushing a broom and
cleaning up the puke of the hungover warehouse workers he seems to
despise so openly...
|