|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2009
Posts: 15
|
|
Sheriff says concealed carry law is helping
http://www.boat-ed.com/ wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.
Anything changed since then?
Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H
For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm
I have no problems if someone wants to own a firearm, as long as the
person is not a lunatic. Anyone who publishes photographs of his
targets, sounds like he should not own a firearm.
What if they name them "Stumpy"?
|