Slim wrote:

On 2009-04-27 19:11:43 -0400, "Long Ranger" said:


"Howard Brazee" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote:

There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the
"indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from

Siberia.


Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much

like

the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology.


The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the
Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then
the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti
Roman-Catholic element.

The result will be the same anyhow.


Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk
reaction by
everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts
thrown
in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of
equivocating.


You yahoo types are soooo funny.

Look in the kitchen of any restaurant, look who is cutting your grass,
look who is cleaning your homes and raising your children!

You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the
Mexicans.

Hypocrites!


Although many people think that employing an illegal is better than
having a slave, you don't feed them, clothe them or have to be bothered
by injury, sickness and death.

Although those are all good arguments, I disagree, In the long run it
harms the economy, keeps American citizens out of work, and puts an
increasing strain upon our health care and school systems.







--






“Someone said to me, what doesn't kill me makes me stronger,
and my response was, that just means, I need to put more bullet
holes in you!” -- Rev. Shawn Cole