"Eisboch" wrote in message
news

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...

The question is what is a desireable outcome here.

If you say freeing the hostages.......WRONG. A desireable outcome is
to minimize future occurences. This may be entirely different from
saving the hostages and not recognizing this fact will result in many
more deaths. Obama is not capable of understanding this. Paying
ransom is morally wrong because it results in more hostages being
taken. Thus, the actiuons of the rest of the world to this point have
been both morally and logically wrong and have brought us to this
point.

--------------------------

I would say that certainly a desirable outcome is to minimize future
occurrences, however......

Agreed, and dead pirate/terrorists never repeat their offences.

Our culture values life. The purpose of law enforcement and the military
is to protect and secure civilian life. There have been many examples of
police, firefighters and military sacrificing more than one casualty or
fatality in the effort to save one civilian life.

These are not civilians. They are terrorist/pirates, they have killed, they
will kill and they hold people/civilians ransom including property. You
even can watch them do it.

That is like I can call the police, I am going to rob a bank and rape a
teller, and they stand by and watch while I do it. Then let me go witha
million dollars.

Give me a break. Our leadership is pathetic.

The primary objective right now is to save the civilian hostage if at all
possible.
Once accomplished, it will be time to minimize future occurrences.

But letting them go or getting them money is not an option.