Speaking of credibility of sources, why are
you here defending FP when you have little info about their products while
over
in ASA you post about your perceptions of the "quality" of all sorts of
things?


I wasn't defending them. I just think they shouldn't be assumed guilty just
because they're a BIG company. This fellow is telling us a story. He's
attacking a company, attempting to damage their rep. There is NO proof that
they are at fault. None at all. I don't see FP attacking him or his business
practices/character.
I hope the problem is resolved soon!

RB

No one is assuming they are guilty, but they spend money to say all kinds of
good things about their products in things you and I read. Why not let folks
have a forum to say bad things about them if they feel strongly enough. You
certainly seem to be defending them. If not, why would you attack Schultz for
attacking FP? They can take care of themselves.