On Feb 11, 8:19*pm, HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Feb 11, 3:16 pm, HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Feb 11, 2:17 pm, HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Feb 11, 1:45 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
If it is as it certainly appears, I agree with you 100%.
Agreed with your comment of "If it is as it certainly appears"
Then, there's the flip side to come out in the courts.
It'll be interesting to hear the reasons why the execs released the
tainted product into the supply chain. *I mean the reasons other than
the ones already stated.
Very true!
i wonder who in the labs got paid off to enable it to be released? Or
were the labs bypassed without clearance?
I suppose w'll *have to wait and find out...
Regardless, from the presently known reports, it sounds like some real
skullduggery goin on, though.
Well, I oppose capital punishment, but I might make an exception for
senior corporate execs who knowingly release tainted food... :) That's
what happens in China.

Yes Harry, he has direct contact with prisoners.

But you're mind is made up to a one sided view. and there will be none
changing that.

So much for "open mindedness"

Historically, it isn't reliable to take the word of jailkeepers as to
how they treat their prisoners. It takes third parties, commissions,
investigatory bodies, et cetera.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You of course mean folks like you who make it up as they go along.