$150M for bee insurance? $20M for Fish barriers? What are those?
_______
AND DIGGING DEEPER INTO THE SLOP, there is this about educational
loans — the Obama-entranced college-agers are not going to like the
taste of Real Obama in the morning, ’cause here’s what’s coming at
them: educational loans “recalculated” to heap-up some extra, extra,
extra deep-dish interest upon interest upon pie-laden porky
interest-heavy student loans.
Why don’t these grubby mammals with their snouts in everyone else’s
trough, why don’t Barack Obama and the Pelosi-Reid Nightmare Bakers,
just reduce taxes overall? They don’t and won’t consider THAT because
there’d be less for their snouts amidst all the troughs, that’s why.
Unfortunately for our nation and those who enjoy the gift of pies from
the U.S.A., reducing taxes overall would be too efficient and easy —
it would taste too good to the taxpayers. So they churn about and
churn and churn and burn all the wholesome pies that might have been
made had they not ruined the kitchen. There are decidedly too many bad
cooks in the kitchen and nary a chef among them.
Ace suggests drinks. I suggest a lot of phone calls and letters and
stocking-up for when this dreadful pipe bursts into the ghastly
kitchen held occupied by these grubby bakers as they all burn-up what
used to be a democratic United States of America, which will soon if
not already no longer look like itself because it’s gained five
hundred trillion pounds of debt, all of which should be by the end of
this month.
By the way, I can bake a cherry pie (and an apple one, and blueberry,
and peach, too) but it’s plain as cake that Nancy Pelosi cannot. And
that Obama thinks everyone else bakes just for him.
And I’m willing to bet — if I was a betting fool — that we can all,
each and every one of us Americans who is not now surrendered all
recipes in service to Obama-the-Baker, I’m willing to bet that we can
all anticipate being chastised if not outright harmed by this man and
his Nightmare Bakers in some way that will genuinely hurt as the
poison goes down — but these Bad Bakers won’t feel a thing.
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:56:11 -0800 (PST), =?windows-1252?Q?No_One=99?=
wrote:
On Feb 7, 4:54 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:39:55 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article , says...
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:23:42 -0500, Kali wrote:
You can start with Nobel Prize winning Paul Krugman:
Not intersted in socialist economists.
He isn't a socialist, he is a liberal.
Yup.
Classic liberalism of the Founders has devolved into a 180.
But can understand why those of you tit suckers who want Uncle Sugar
to pay for abortions, sex ed, child care, job-finding assistance would
be.
Surprised you don't want the government to provide you with a personal
trainer and a masseuse.
Here's a very easily understood primer on the conflict:
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/...n2009/db200901
27_702149.htm?campaign_id=3Drss_topStories
I'll stick with the guy who saw all of this coming a long time ago;
the guy who won a Nobel Prize; an eminent scholar of the Great
Depression. Hopefully there will be enough spending to really get
the economy going again.
You can go ahead and insist on tax cuts only or the extreme
conservative view: do nothing. But I think something is going to be
done, regardless. Personally I think the GOP should sit down and
STFU after what they've dragged us through economically, but I fear
Obama will put the appearance of bipartisanship over all else.
In a couple of years we'll know if Moody's multipliers are correct -
they are less generous on the effect of tax cuts than Obama's team's
multipliers.
Lump sum tax rebate: 1.02
Temp across the board tax cut: 1.03
Temp payroll tax holiday: 1.29
Perm/extend AMT patch: .48
Bush tax cuts permanent: .29
Cap gains/div tax permanent: .37
Perm cut corporate tax rate: .30
Extend unemployment benefits: 1.64
Temp increase in food stamps: 1.73
General aid to state govt: 1.36
Increased infrastructure spending: 1.59
http://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/do...the-impact-of-
the-fiscal-stimulus.pdf
[... and another dumbass wingnut greggie sock goes into the bin.]
--
Kali
=93This is not a stimulus bill; it is a spending bill.=94
-Sen. John McCain
=93What do you think a stimulus is? Spending, that is the whole
point.=94 -Pres. Barack Obama
Spending that won't achieve the desired end.
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=3D10147
Mr. Obama would have us believe that unless they pass his 900 billion
dollar "stimulus" package immediately, our entire nation is going to
plunge into oblivion. That's right, no time to study or rationally
review anything! Just throw massive amounts of worthless money at
random targets and "hope" it all somehow gets better.
Didn't we learn anything at ALL from the last "stimulus" fiasco? More
precisely... is there anybody left in Washington with a brain? And
why the big rush Mr. President? Could it be because your "stimulus"
package is so full of pork it virtually oinks?
It's been jokingly referred to as every Democratic special interest
group's 40 Year Wish List. Most American's don't find that all that
funny. Even The Wall Street Journal said "By our estimate only $90
billion out of $825 billion, or about 12 cents of every $1, is for
something that can plausibly be considered a growth stimulus. And even
many of these projects aren't likely to help the economy immediately.
The rest is pork."
Here's some of what we can expect out of this newest spending orgy.
The only thing it will stimulate is my sense of outrage!!! What part
of THIS COUNTRY IS ALREADY BANKRUPT do they not understand?
$2 billion earmark to re-start FutureGen, a near-zero emissions coal
power plant in Illinois that the Department of Energy defunded last
year because it said the project was inefficient.
A $246 million tax break for hollywood movie producers to buy motion
picture film.
$650 million for the digital television converter box coupon program.
$88 million for the Coast Guard to design a new polar icebreaker
(arctic ship).
$448 million for constructing the Department of Homeland Security
headquarters.
$248 million for furniture at the new Homeland Security headquarters.
$600 million to buy hybrid vehicles for federal employees.
$400 million for the Centers for Disease Control to screen and prevent
STD's.
$1.4 billion for rural waste disposal programs.
$125 million for the Washington sewer system.
$150 million for Smithsonian museum facilities.
$1 billion for the 2010 Census, which has a projected cost overrun of
$3 billion.
$75 million for "smoking cessation activities."
$200 million for public computer centers at community colleges.
$75 million for salaries of employees at the FBI.
$25 million for tribal alcohol and substance abuse reduction.
$500 million for flood reduction projects on the Mississippi River.
$10 million to inspect canals in urban areas.
$6 billion to turn federal buildings into "green" buildings.
$500 million for state and local fire stations.
$650 million for wildland fire management on forest service lands.
$1.2 billion for "youth activities," including youth summer job
programs.
$88 million for renovating the headquarters of the Public Health
Service.
$412 million for CDC buildings and property.
$500 million for building and repairing National Institutes of Health
facilities in Bethesda, Maryland.
$160 million for "paid volunteers" at the Corporation for National and
Community Service.
$5.5 million for "energy efficiency initiatives" at the Department of
Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration.
$850 million for Amtrak.
$100 million for reducing the hazard of lead-based paint.
$75 million to construct a "security training" facility for State
Department Security officers when they can be trained at existing
facilities of other agencies.
$110 million to the Farm Service Agency to upgrade computer systems.
$200 million in funding for the lease of alternative energy vehicles
for use on military installations.
Oink. Oink. Oink.
Yeah, that's a liberal trick. Kinda like the bridge to nowhere.