BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Way Back Jack

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote:

In article ,
says...

Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal
(paraphrased):

Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA.
_______

Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who
cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to
redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy.

Just another example of my contradictory nature.
____

Posted from alt.free.newsservers

So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and
food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then
when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help.

What part of "healthy" don't you understand?

Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare
mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the
poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a
laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't
mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What
hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like
job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare
mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and
who doesn't?

You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc.

A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps.

You know about whom I am talking.

And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed
to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control,
abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child
care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies".
--
Kali

With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against
of those left-wing abominations, Hillary.