wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 10:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 9:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





"Eisboch" wrote in message

...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 9:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message

news:hsmdnQBP3bw4vOXUnZ2dnUVZ_rbinZ2d@giganews. com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

I see that Clinton's nomination was approved 48-2. That's
interesting.

48-2

I guess I'll never understand politics and politicians.

How is one who has demonstrated (and basically acknowledged) that
they
make up stories and repeatedly lie to the media and voters, then,
when
caught, arrogantly shrug it off, get appointed to important
positions
like
Secretary of State?

And to top it off, she's considered to be an outstanding, world
class
leader by many.
No wonder this country is going down the tubes. Honesty and
integrity
are
no longer qualification requirements for much of anything.

Unreal.

Eisboch

And yet, she's respected by congress, and according to what I've
read,
has a
good relationship with the Pentagon, which could be a good thing
considering
what we're involved with lately.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, I wonder how many who "respect" her also had the privelage of
having her scour their FBI records for a couple of years last time
she
was in the Oval Office... You don't really think those 2500 or so
carefully picked folders sat quietly on the floor of her office for
two years do you?

===================

Tell me why she was approved so easily by congress yesterday.

Oh, come on. Congress is on a roll. Very few are going to stick their
neck out at the moment.

Eisboch

We shall see. I suspect "Yes sir" won't be big in her discussions with
Obama, which was the situation with Rice & Bush. I like that. Bush ran a
monolithic show, according to insiders. That's not good, although it's
not
surprising for certain types of people.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Which insiders? You and Harry? Or are you talking about fired aids and
glory seekers?

=========================

When I'm driving around and listening to the grownup news, I keep a
notepad
in the car so I can jot down hard-to-remember names of people being
interviewed. I do this for just one reason: So I can relay the names to
people like you who do NOT listen to the grownup news. I'll go out to the
car later and get the list for you.

Ha.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ha! I see, if I don't listen to the same sources as you (and I listen
to news all day) my news is not grown up.. You sound like my daughter,
so sure of herself but only listens to NPR and the New York Lies...
She feels however that she is more "enlightened" than I even though I
listen to NPR and several other sources, way more than her. What do
you consider "grown up news"?

=================

NPR and BBC. If there are others whose stories last longer than 15 seconds
each, I'd be interested in hearing about them. You cannot be well informed
using a news service which just reads you a headline and maybe two more
sentences. Not possible, not debatable.