John H wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:37:23 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:12:56 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:55:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...

The scary part is where did the fissonable material go?

Makes no difference. Now that we have a liberal president, everyone
will
be
nice to us because we'll sit down and talk while holding hands.
Therefore
there is no threat.
--
John H


John, your diaper needs changing.

Have you ever notice that liberals (excluding Loogy, of course) must
resort
to insults or name-calling to justify their position.

Does it enhance your 'argument'? Does it improve your self-esteem?
--
John H

It was more fun than pointing out the unbelievable stupidity of what you
said, and reminding you to stop listening to whoever feeds you the pablum
you regurgitate here.

But you didn't answer the questions.

You responded with more insults. Does it enhance your self-esteem to do
so?

Do you agree that is the liberal methodology?
--
John H

Prove that Obama will be any gentler with our enemies than Bush and Rice
were.

Do it right now, using quotes only from Obama's own words. No editorials, no
blogs, no news articles, no 3rd party analyses.


Close enough:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQx45ro_PT8

or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSFSUbMWenU
--
John H

*A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. *

Clear as mud but nice try. Truth is that no one can prove how Obama will
react to a real world situation. All we have to go on is what he says.
And you can't draw any conclusions based on that because he is not a man
of his word. That's been proven.