On Jan 17, 9:59*am, BAR wrote:
John H wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:40:10 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..

I wish someone could explain the satisfaction Harry finds in the fact that
companies are going out of business.

Is this good for liberals somehow? Circuit City had employees who had
jobs,
even if those folks did nothing. Is it in the best interest of liberals
that the unemployed numbers grow larger?

I'm missing something somewhere.

Some companies deserve to go out of business due to the lack of quality of
their service, products or internal culture.

In the case of Circuit City, it was on the edge anyway. *The economic crisis
and retail downturn was simply the straw that broke the camel's back.

Eisboch

Agreed. Circuit City just happened to be the company 'du jour'. Harry, or
other liberals, continuously post articles of companies losing money or
going out of business. And then make gleeful 'I told you so' comments.
That's what I can't understand.

What is there about companies going out of business that brings joy to the
heart of a liberal?

Is it just simply 'anti-corporation'?

It really baffles me why you would cheer a corporation going bankrupt
and putting 30,000 people on the unemployment line. The people who
suffer the most are the 30,000 people on the unemployment line not the
executives of the company.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry sees this as an opportunity for the very far loonie left to take
power and force changes down the throats of Americans that they have
defeated in the voting booth for decades... It's the elitist method of
rule, what's good for them, should be fine with the rest of us.