Thread: Multi-tool.
View Single Post
  #41   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
[email protected] LoogyPicker@gmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,892
Default Multi-tool.

On Jan 7, 10:44*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 9:56 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message


...
On Jan 7, 8:47 am, Jim wrote:


wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:00 am, hk wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 6, 10:36 pm, Vic Smith
wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:51:59 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:34:00 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Also, I know that leatherman and gerber made much better stuff
10+
years ago than they do today, with ownership changes and lowered
standards, etc
Excuse me?
Leatherman tools rule.
Isn't that a glorified Swiss Army knife?
Never met a multi-tool I liked except for a claw hammer.
A decent tool box doesn't take up much space.
If you're convinced send me that Leatherman and I'll take a look at
it
before I get rid of it.
Already posted my address.
--Vic
The guy I posted for will be using it to carry on a dirtbike.. no
room
for a toolbox, even a small one...
===========
If the Leatherman Wave is good enough for Les Stroud, it's just the
thing
for your friend.
That's the one I have...but I understand Leatherman "retired" that
model. It's a great little pocket tool. I even pack it in my
checked-in
luggage when I fly somewhere. Used to be able to keep it in my
pocket...- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


You're not allowed to have them on a commercial flight because it has
a knife, liar.


http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtrav...tted-prohibite...


He is a liar, but not necessarily in this case. You need to apologize to
harold.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Nope, I would have, but the fat slob had to instantly start his
insults, so, no thanks. Harry's so desperate here for someone to talk
to him that he's acting like the former Tuuk


==============


OK...let me get this straight:


1) You read what he said, but did not comprehend all of it.


2) You posted a link which failed to prove your point.


3) You're not mature enough to admit you were wrong.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, you didn't "get this straight". Has absolutely nothing to do with
maturity. Hell, your buddy Harry has been asked several times for an
apology when proven wrong and has never done so. So, why should
anybody apologize to someone who has never done so himself, and has
done nothing but call that person vulgar childish names and insulted
that person at every occasion?
=======================

Translation:
"But mom....the other kids were throwing rocks at the window too. How come
I'm gettin' time out?"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Oh, hell, I guess you've come back to be nothing more than a whining
child huh? Let's try again, and see if this hits your brain. First,
you'll never get a job as a translator, you just think you know what
someone else is thinking. Second, apparently your brain didn't
understand that AS I SAID TO BEGIN WITH, if Harry hadn't have
instantly turned on the asshole-a-tron, he may have gotten an apology.
Thirdly, I really don't give a crap what you think. Add to that the
fact that you come back here only to be an ass, and well, the answer
should come to you, grasshopper.