"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:39:27 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
om...
Don White wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 4, 6:57 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

news




On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:17:51 -0500, HK
wrote:
Don't forget the army of idiot crossposters he unleashed when we
ignored him... The man is a one man destruction team for usenet.
Every
group has one...
You really are a piece of work. You are a foul-mouthed uneducated
ignorant piece of ****, perfectly suited to hang out with Loogy,
Herring, et al.
This group and its occupants needs to be advertised far and wide.
Harry Krause
2015 Rosedale Lane
Huntingtown, Maryland 20639
410 535-1594 (voice)
202 365-0164 (cell)
John Herring
6024 Mayfair Lane
Alexandria, Virginia 22310
(703) 971-8743- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Gee Donnie.. how about yours? Or are you just a punk bitch putting
out
others info and hiding under your desk?

************************************************** ******************

I remember well a couple years ago when you got mouthy with
Loogie/Basskisser.
When he started making plans to visit you in person, you got more &
more hysterical by the hour.
At the end of the day, you had all your neighbours, the local police,
mayor and half of the town in front of your house waiting to confront
Loogie.
Hee hee....and you accuse me of hiding under a desk.

He was afraid of Loogy? I know he won't show up here to start trouble,
because he knows exactly what will happen to him. He'll be the
Headless
Horse****ter of Atlanta.

That's one of the reasons why I'm so against this bull**** of posting
addresses. You never know who is close enough to the edge to actually
show up.
I always wondered about Loogy....
On the other hand, if a person isn't argumentative, he probably has
little to worry about...John should know that you probably have a 'few
fans' in this group or others.

So Donnie, I guess you agree it is not wise to post your name in UseNet.
Who says you can't teach an old dumb dog new tricks.

As much as it pains me to ever agree with you...the last day or two is
starting to make me re-consider.
As a Canadian, I like to assume most of us are honourable people who don't
really want to expose each other to potential harm or harassment.
Rather than a dog...think of me as more of a 'country boy' being exposed
to
big city ways.


Then I suppose the whole thing was worth it. Would you agree that one who
does not totally identify themselves is *not* a ****ing coward?

FWIW, I called the number in Westlake, OH, this morning. A lady answered
the phone. I told her several calls were made from her number last night
and asked for the name of the caller. She wouldn't give it to me, and
that's OK.

Because there is a lady involved, who I assume is the wife of the caller,
I
will take this no further as far as police go, nor will I call the number
again. Consequences of the totally immature behavior of the guy should not
have to be paid by the wife. (Although that concept wasn't adhered to by
the caller, who said, "Did you tell your wife what you said about her?"
and
"I want to **** your wife.")

Which of the boys would you place your money on, Don?

I would not speculate on who would be involved. We have no idea who is
reading our posts. (at least I don't)
It does bother me that your wife, an innocent party in all of this, has been
affected.
Maybe the newsgroup needs a referee with a big stick to keep things from
regressing to this state.