wrote in message
...
On Jan 2, 10:15 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 2, 10:10 am, John H wrote:
Using your logic, should we not wreak havoc on Mexico?
Yes, but in a way that's appropriate to the issue.
Good, an answer. What does 'appropriate to the issue' mean in your
usage?
And, additionally, should we not 'punish' *any* country whose
citizens
or
leaders expressed happiness after the 9/11 incident?
Nope. That's not a good way to use our soldiers, although that doesn't
matter to you.
Doug, have you ever noticed that YOU, when asked a question,
will ignore the question, quickly change the subject, or BEGIN WITH THE
PERSONAL INSULTS, rather than simply answer the question?
Are you prepared to discuss the way the Saudis caused the deaths of
more
soldiers in Iraq than anyone other foreign power in the region?
Are you now *CHANGING THE SUBJECT* again?
If you are not prepared to discuss this issue, please explain why. Is
there
something in the article which you believe to be inaccurate?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/22/wo...ghters.html?_r...
From your (unbiased) source: "The data show that despite increased
efforts
by Saudi Arabia to clamp down on would-be terrorists since Sept. 11,
2001,
when 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, some Saudi fighters are still
getting through."
Note also that the entire article is "...according to senior American
military officials." In other words, probably bull****. You deny being a
liberal but base your 'arguments' on the NY Times. 'Nuff said.
John, you are in a labrynth of misquoted facts and intellecual
dishonesty. You are right about Mexico though. It is a pretty well
documented fact that Vicente Fox encouraged and supported the Mexican
incursion into the US in his time as President of Mexico. The
corruption and gangland style of government is flowing over to the US
and between the border scirmishes and the gangs he has sent here we
have lost more US citizens than we lost in 9/11. But either way, Joe
is not interested in such facts, just winning little arguments here.
One wonders why he came back..
=================
Are you saying that if we adopt a policy in a certain part of the world,
we
must be consistent and adopt it everywhere else too?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Oh for God sakes.. cut it out Joe, I am not playing your endless game
of ask but don't ever answer....
===============
It's a perfectly reasonable question. You're saying that we shouldn't even
think about dealing properly with Saudi Arabia unless we simultaneously do
the same with Mexico. That's absurd for many reasons.