"BAR" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
Don White wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
There's just way too many people in the world today.
We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next few
generations or we'll all be over run.

I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to have
more than one or two kids.
Why don't you start preaching that to Africa, Middle East and Asia.


Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone
else does?
Yes. If it is good for us it is good for everyone.


So, you think we should freeze technology until Africa catches up with
the program. That's nonsense, of course, but you're not here to say
things which make sense.

Try again tomorrow if and when you're sober.

You are the one proposing that we freeze technology to wait for the rest
of the world to catch up to us. If limiting children to one per couple is
good for the developed world why isn't it good for the undeveloped world?
If limiting CO2 emissions in the developed world is good then why not
limit CO2 emissions in the undeveloped world?


Uh...no.

Above, I asked you this:

"Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone else
does?"

Your response was:

"Yes."

Therefore, YOU are suggesting that we improve nothing until Africa catches
up with us. Since Africa will probably NEVER catch up with us, your answer
is absurd.