BAR wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
Don White wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
There's just way too many people in the world today.
We have to come up with a way to 'thin the herd' over the next
few generations or we'll all be over run.

I agree completely, and I think it inappropriate for families to
have more than one or two kids.
Why don't you start preaching that to Africa, Middle East and Asia.


Does that mean we shouldn't improve certain practices until everyone
else does?
Yes. If it is good for us it is good for everyone.


So, you think we should freeze technology until Africa catches up with
the program. That's nonsense, of course, but you're not here to say
things which make sense.

Try again tomorrow if and when you're sober.

You are the one proposing that we freeze technology to wait for the rest
of the world to catch up to us. If limiting children to one per couple
is good for the developed world why isn't it good for the undeveloped
world? If limiting CO2 emissions in the developed world is good then why
not limit CO2 emissions in the undeveloped world?

Cause they don't have the money to get bilked into the Global Taxing
hoax... We do, we are ripe for the picking for folks like Al Gore who's
house uses 22 times the energy mind does and has made tons of money on
the scam....
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------