|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 723
|
|
Why didn't the Palin family...
Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 31, 6:35 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 31, 3:51 pm, Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
Indeed, Cheney has not been indicted and convicted, so he's no
more a
criminal than OJ is a murderer. The two share the same moral
compass.
I wonder if one has to be actually indicted or convicted to
qualify for
a Presidential pardon, or can Bush issue a blanket pardon for
anything
he and/or Cheney could possibly be charged with after they leave
office.
Eisboch
Blanket, I believe. Gerry Ford gave Nixon one of those, didn't he?
I'd be happy if Bush gave Cheney one, because it would mean he was
guilty of criminal acts.
I doubt Bush can pardon himself.
He hasn't committed any crime that isn't some fantasy of some pimple
faced punk pulling his dick, blogging in his mom's basement... Oh, and
commentators on MSNBC, The Daily Hoax, and The New York Lies...
Now you're a lawyer? snerk- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Nope, that would be your party, and not one of em' has gotten beyond
daydreaming about charges...
Scott, you are in no position to know whether Cheney committed crimes.
There have been many serious accusations about him, and commentary about
the reluctance to prosecute.
I think a pardon for Cheney is in order. I'd welcome it. It would be
prima facie evidence that he is a criminal.
Just, you are in no position to know whether Cheney committed crimes,
but Harry is. Harry is wired with everyone in power.
|