On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:21:20 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should
have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could
care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal,
concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn
sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious'
people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.

No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--

John


That's funny. You don't look Jewish.



What does Jewish look like Krousie?

You nitwits need to get out in the world a litlle more. "Funny, you
don't look Jewish" is a VERY old and well worn comeback line. It pokes
fun at the notion of stereotypes. Frank Zappa helped popularize it for
younger generations.