On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:27:19 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:48:41 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?
--

Salmonbait
You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?
I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait

I'll be delighted to watch your progress in bringing the group around to
your way of thinking. If I notice any *positive* changes of significance
in the behaviors of those I haven't bozo-binned, I will gladly extend
them the same courtesy. This, of course, is precisely the "deal" I
offered previously.

No offense, but I have the feeling *you* think you have an ability to
cajole or negotiate me over to your position. I've told you many times I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less.

Now, perhaps you want to work on the others for a few weeks.

Harry, have you forgotten already the post you made not two hours ago?

*******************************
38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a
tooth for a tooth: Ex. 21.24 · Lev. 24.20 · Deut. 19.21
39 but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall
smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
**************************************

You hold this up as a standard, yet make a statement like, "I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less."

No offense, but don't you see just a little hypocrisy in that?
--

Salmonbait


Jesus is your saviour, not mine.

Which means what? Does your comment mean that you disagree with your quote?
If so, then why post it?


--

Salmonbait