"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
anews.com...

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...

"Shad O'Shay" wrote in message
...
This person sounds like a paranoid, revengeful nut case. (and I ain't
talking about Perez) Wow!

http://www.sailsea.org/

Be careful where you go to learn how to sail.


Shad O'Shay



Jonathan did a job no one else wanted (at no pay) for 5 years. He grew
the outfit in size and scope. Many people benefitted from his hard work.
He was the only one qualified to teach the larger and harder classes.
The non profit was nominated for a prestigious award with him at the
helm. He's got an MBA AND USCG captain's license, two combined
qualifications that are hard to find. It was HIS vision and HIS hard,
selfless work. Now that things are up and running smoothly a bunch of
ingrate wannabes wanted to take over and take over they did. It wasn't a
simple vote that got him outed, it was a deliberate conspiracy. Jonathan
shouldn't go back, he is only lowering himself to their standards. He
might do much better creating a new, competing non profit with iron clad
bylaws that don't allow others to commandeer the ship. It won't be the
same if he goes back, hurt feelings and grudges usually can never be put
aside. Be the better man and take the high road, it will serve you well
in the long term. He may have made mistakes, he has admitted them and
now he can use what he has learned to do much, much better. Anger and
resentment are based upon things of the past, hope and vigor are for the
future! Carry the torch forward and may it shine brightly upon all!

Admiral Momsen

Good grief, Momsen, have you taken leave of your senses? Have you been
drinking the liberal Kool Aid? Have you been smoking some of that there
wacky tobaccy? Or perhaps you got ahold of some of Gaynze's 10X strength
LSD?

Get a grip on yourself, Admiral! Next thing you know, if you keep
spouting such nonsense, Obama will come schlepping around and appoint you
to head the Joint Chiefs of Staff!

You need to get a clue. There's some behind-the-scenes information I am
privy to which sheds an entirely new light upon this situation. I can't
be specific at this time but it concerns possible abuse of the non-profit
status of the organization by the fired member. Does the term "under the
table" mean anything to you? This whole episode with the web site and the
feuding is all about a cover-up. Of course the organization wants rid of
a possible huge liability but said liability thinks only about its own
hurt pride. I understand Perez has even been talking to an F. Lee Bailey
type (shhhhh! don't tell anybody).

Can you expand your rigid mind to encompass such a scenario? It happens
all the time. Usually greed is at the core of the misdoings. Greed and a
total disregard for the law. This is how liberals think - laws are for
somebody else.

Wilbur Hubbard


Are you saying he might have been outed because of corruption? That the
possibility of operating a non profit for personal benefit was going on?
Personal enurement? How could that happen? How would he get the
"beancounter" to go along? Naahh...


I can't say one way or the other due to the possibility of ongoing legal
issues. I sure don't wish to run afoul of any F. Lee Bailey types or the
FBI. Even barely competent, bottom-rungers like our Dapper Dave could cause
some small measure of grief.

You've got me to thinking with your observations above. Viewed in that
light, my prior observations do seem quite absurd.

As far as Gaynze operating a non-profit for personal gain, you're right,
that's ludicrous. Think, Wilbur, think! If a person could operate "anything"
for personal gain would he still be living at home with Mommy at close to
fifty years of age? Would he still have Mommy fighting all his legal battles
pro-bono? I think not. And, besides, with his documented history of 10X
strength LSD dropping he can get out of anything simply by using an insanity
plea. In this case, as in any other case, Gaynze can be nothing other than
the innocent victim. If he did happen to profit from a non-profit I'm sure
it was totally unintentional. I'm sure he "meant well" and isn't that what
really matters?

The more I ruminate upon the matter the more I think you might be right
about how there's no way Gaynze could do any wrong either intentionally or
unintentionally. The man is just way too intelligent for that to happen. Not
to mention the fact that he has impeccable moral standards. As usual,
though, it's way more likely that he's being implicated in a conspiracy for
the wrongdoings of people out to get him. So, Momsen, I stand corrected and
I offer my sincere apologies to the Capt. for not having my facts straight
at first and jumping to false conclusions. I've always been a sucker for a
good conspiracy theory.


I think Jonathan is telling the truth. It's just like he says it is. It
was a conspiracy and mutiny against him. The loser half wits tossed him
overboard to run the show. He should up the ante to get reinstated back
into his rightful and hard earned position. Those people who voted against
should be publicly flogged, keel hauled and made to walk the plank!
Jonathan, don't give up the ship or the financial records!


Agreed! One cannot argue with your many years of wisdom, Admiral. Keep up
the good work. You have restored my faith in humanity.

Wilbur Hubbard