Thread
:
Bridge loan to nowhere..
View Single Post
#
398
posted to rec.boats
BAR[_3_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,227
Bridge loan to nowhere..
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:45:40 -0500, John wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:23:49 -0600,
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:23:39 -0500, John wrote:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...tribution.html
Thunder, do you really believe the 'worker' has increased his output
by 20%? Does that line make sense to you?
The fact that you read it in an anti-Bush article doesn't make it
true.
As you are clearly too lazy to do your own search:
http://www.bls.gov/lpc/prodybar.htm
Let's see, 7 * 2.5 = 17.5 You could then extrapolate, considering it is
2008. So, yes, I do believe the 'worker' has increased his output by
20%, even though, I probably shouldn't believe anything that comes out
of the Bush government.
That's overall productivity, not an increase in productivity of
'workers'.
If I have an assembly line with 10 workers, I replace five with a robot,
and my output remains constant, does that mean the productivity of the
five remaining workers has increased by 100%? Should I double the pay
of the remaining five workers?
If you believe that, then I can understand your anguish.
Well, seeing you are talking an assembly line, productivity in the
manufacturing sector was 26% between 2000-2007. I'm well aware of what
"productivity" is, and I'm also quite aware that productivity has
increased, wages haven't kept up, which was the whole point of the first
link posted.
What does "productivity in the manufacturing sector was 26% between
2000-2007" mean. Do you mean there was a 26% in crease in productivity
in the manufacturing sector between 2000 and 2007?
The individual worker cannot take credit for the robot's productivity.
The individual worker needs to be measured individually to determine
whether that individual worker has increased their productivity.
I'd also point out, that article was posted in reply to Just's statement
that "The lazy ones who won't work need the representation." Well,
apparently, that's not true, now is it?
Outstanding performers are taken care of, those who just show up and do
enough to get a paycheck should work for someone else.
Reply With Quote
BAR[_3_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by BAR[_3_]