Dave wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:24:04 -0500, Marty said:

Your are a bit of on odd duck Dave.

I am perhaps sui generis.

Now it appears that when the Court renders an opinion that you disagree
with, you accuse them of being mentally incompetent.

Please identify the post in which I suggested that the Court or any of its
members is mentally incompetent. You do understand, I assume, that being
wrong is not the same as being mentally incompetent.


That would be: "When the Court "discovers" new rights which no rational
person could believe were in the minds of those ratifying the
Constitution or applicable amendments, they have changed the document
without following the procedure called for to change it"

The bit about "no rational person" rather implies mental incompetency
does it not?

Cheers
Martin