On Dec 10, 9:56*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 10, 9:33 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 10, 7:48 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:15:57 -0500, BAR wrote:
Direct contact or indirect contact? Is there a legal difference?
Is one a crime and the other a conspiracy to commit crime?
IANAL, but, so far, I don't see any crime that Obama was involved in.. *
I'm not even sure, that if he did pay for the Senate seat, if that would
be a crime. *It sure as hell would be distasteful, I'm not sure about a
crime. *I suspect, among politicians, *nothing* gets given away for
free. *How do you think all that pork gets added to bills? *"I'll vote
for your bill, if you will build me a bridge to nowhere."
What was really funny was Daily talking about how disgusted he was in
the corruption.. He is probably just one notch above Jackson on the
most likely and deserving reciepients of a.... These two families
links to corruption are only surpassed by the Kennedys...
Other than some crap you read on a reich-wing web site or heard on
right-wing hate radio, what serious evidence do you have that pins
Richard M. Daley to real corruption?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, let me see... About as many times as you have told the truth here
in the last 15 years.. That would be uh, zero...

Yup. You got nuttin' but the crap you suckle on from the reich-wing
sites. You weren't even aware that the current Daley in Chicago isn't
the one you vaguely remember.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, since I don't listen to talk radio, can I assume you make up the
rest too? Of course I can, you couldn't have an intellectually honest
conversation if your life depended on it, dismissed...