Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
About $8000 for the body only. (Yikes)

24,5 Megapixel in FX-Format
3D Color Matrix II, Center-Weighted and Spot Metering
1 - 7 fps
1/8000 to 30 seconds shutter
ISO equivalency 100 to 1,600
2 lb 11 oz / 1220 g
Price est. $7,995 USD body

Another FX-format camera means that Nikon will jump back with both
feet into the production of full-frame lenses, updating some of the
current ones and introducing new ones.

SW Tom should buy of the new D3X boxes...


I have a friend who would be the one to buy this camera. But he
makes his living as a professional photographer, and lots of his are
Corporate annual reports where they need high quality photos. Most
of his pics are stored on the computer hooked up to the camera and
are 200 mbytes or greater. The rest of us use the $1000 or less
Nikon SLR.
Really? Most of the pros I know use larger format cameras for
large-page annual reports and other publications where the highest
quality is required. Hasselblads rule. Nothing wrong with 35mm frame
size, of course, but bigger images are better, quality-wise.


Guy has not shot film in years. All digital.

I just ordered this for my back up camera
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc..._Camera.ht ml





When you charge $3000 a day plus %500 a day for an assistant, plus
expenses, which is what the Left Coast photographer I use charges, you
can afford whatever you want. The woman I hire out there for commercial
photography uses Hasselblad film cameras, as does the architectural
photographer I hire. In fact, for cover shots, he uses a 4x5 film
camera. They shoot transparency film. For Q&D shots, though, they do use
digital Nikons or Canons.