View Single Post
  #44   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_3_] Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 723
Default Messing with Mother Nature

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:10:37 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."


As always, you do provide very detailed and well thought out critiques.

I've been guilty of this myself so I can safely say this technique is
way over used for routine imaging.

The whole point of using slower shutter speeds is to invoking water
"movement" and not replicate fire hose type streams of uninteresting
water flow. Done properly, you really don't need to use slower speeds
- just focal length and proper exposures.

http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=10461


Very nice photo, and very subtle use of HDR.


Shorter times produce images which convey more impression than actual
replication like this:

http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=22928

To properly use longer times, you have to at least have an idea of
where you will be taking the image and what you are trying to convey.

For example:

http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=35667

And then there are the impressionistic type of images that echo the
true style of light, color and movement in classically open style.

http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=39529

Also, I'd be interested if you shot these in RAW and what compression
ratio you used when you brought them out into .jpeg. Just looking a
little closer at them, it seems to me that something was lost in the
translation. Maybe a defraction issue? Did you use auto sharpen on
bringing them out to .jpeg? Something isn't right.


I did shoot these in RAW with no compression on the RAW. I use a batch
conversion macro in Lightroom (I think), and had it set up 640x480 size
with auto sharpen Landscape. I have never seen a jpg compression ratio,
I thought jpg just compressed it as much as possible. I also have never
used a batch conversion before, and never reduce the size so small, so I
really don't know if this is the result to expect or not.

Finally, I think you're trying too hard with this lanscape thing - let
the image speak to you before you try to shoot it. Think about where
you want it to go and what you want to do with it. What is it telling
you? It just seems that you took shots to take shots.

Sorry - you asked. :)


Nope I am not sorry I asked. As I have always said, I do try to learn
from all critique's and my feeling are never hurt. As with most of your
critiques, you do give your honest opinion and spend a lot of time
providing detail to reinforce your opinion. I appreciate it, I would
just recommend that for the next few week's, you look under your car
before you crank the engine.