|
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,757
|
|
Whooopeee!!!!!
wrote in message
...
On 18 Nov 2008 17:01:01 -0600, Dave wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:11:07 -0500, said:
It had ZERO to do with whether the labor was union or non-union, or
how much money they were paid.
$1,000 an hour for everyone, right? Won't make any difference.
The only people making $1000 an hour were in management. Once again
you are avoiding the truth. The workers were not making $1000 an hour.
If they had, it would have made a difference, but they DIDN'T. YOU
have already pegged the difference in wages between Toyota and UAW
workers at $30 an hour. Just another dead red herring to throw on the
pile.
Not a red herring at all. I was simply demonstrating how your claim that
the
amount paid labor has zero to do with a company's ability to compete is
ludicrous.
Except we are talking about a specific company, and you went off the
deep end with a nonsensical Hail Mary about paying the assembly line
workers $1000 an hour.
Red Herring. A big stinking Red Herring being ridden hard and put away
wet by a straw man.
Dave's just snapping. Sure, labor costs are a factor. BUT GM makes lousy
cars. That's the bigger factor, as evidenced by the more expensive cars that
Toyota/Honda sell hand over foot.
--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com
|