Clams Canino wrote:

Harry - minus the "nutcase" part - he's right.

You **of all people** know the proper methods of inserting editorial
comment(s) into the work of another author. I'm dissapointed.

-W


"Jim" wrote in message
news:9Ov5b.259521$cF.81478@rwcrnsc53...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim wrote:

Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing
conservative" into
the
first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is
the original
story:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html


Indeed, rather than just post a news story, I added editorial
comment.

No you didn't. You added your own text to the original story, making
it appear as
though that is the way it was originally written.


I don't recall reading where anyone put you in charge of anything at
all, much less deciding what is or is not an editorial comment.


LOL!

Any news story you now post is suspect as you have been proven to change
the wording in
the story to suit your needs.

That is not called editorial comment.

You continue to prove yourself to be a class A nutcase Harry.




As I said before, nothing is beneath you. You are pathetic. And a
true nutcase.


High praise indeed, especially when it emanates from right-wing scum
like you. Thanks.


That is your only defense? On par with what a 10 year old may present.

Get help Harry. Really.




Oh, puh-lease. You don't really think I take any of these pathetic
right-wingers here seriously. As I have stated over and over, I toss
them a line or two when I feel like it, just to watch them act like
Pavlov's dog. Jim is a first-rate drooler, right up there with NOYB and
a few other of the "anon" righties here.

I see no need to waste any time typing in "reasoned" responses to their
drivel. If I did, it might be interpreted that I take any of the crap
they post seriously.

None of them are worth more than a few seconds of effort.




--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.