BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - Oh Harry. Sell your guns before Barry takes them.

Boater[_2_]

wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:37 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:26 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:17 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:05 pm, Boater wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:02 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 9:36 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:59:34 -0400, Boater wrote:
This from a dope who admits to buying *two* BMWs?
One of my BMW's cost me three hundred, the other seven. Drove them
both to death. The mechanicals held up, but not the fenders. A 66 1600
and a 68 1800. They both handled about as well as a new one today.
Casady
He really succeded in avoiding any of the issues in this thread. Oh,
but he will deflect with another insult I guess
Get a life.
Or perhaps a brain...one or the other.
Yesterday you told O'hara you wanted political debate, but you really
don't.
Sure I do. As soon as you offer up any cogent arguments presented in a
civil fashion, I'll consider offering the same in return. The problem
is, you don't know how to debate.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You know exactly what my questions are, I simply asked for comments on
certain bills Obama has promised to support. You are obviously
uninformed, otherwise you would not be ducking the question.. Good
night, go do some reading and form a real opinion, and here's a hint.
The DNC talking points are not enough..
As I stated, when you present evidence you are capable of presenting
arguments cogently and in a civil manner, I will consider engaging you.
All you are doing is presenting the same old Justwaitaloogy nonsense.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just answer the question Harry. Dismissal is just an excuse..
Sorry, Justwaitaloogy, but I don't answer to you on this or anything
else. I told you what my rules were - present arguments cogently and
behave in a civil manner. If you cannot or will not behave properly, I
won't engage you in "debate." Go play with Loogy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My questions were clear and consice.
Do you know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is?
Do you support it and why?
Are you familiar with the voter privacy union bill?
Do you support it and why?
If you can't answer or understand those questions, you have no
business trying to come across as informed, no matter how many insults
and deflections you throw at me... I speak English just like you, the
only difference is I don't hide from questions behind insults and
elitist excuses..

Actually, you *don't* speak English "just like" me. And one more time,
I'll not "debate" you until and unless I see some evidence you know how
to debate cogently and in a civil fashion. So far, you have done nothing
but demonstrate you cannot.

Oh...yes, I am familiar with the Fairness Doctrine and its history, and
I am very familiar with what you are referring to as the "voter privacy
union bill.

I don't know why I would want to debate either of these with you,
though. I'm sure you don't know anything about either, other than what
you can google from your usual reich-wing b.s. sites. I've already seen
those.

Again, you should debate those at your level of knowledge and
intellectuality. Your buddy Loogy comes to mind.