"JimC" wrote in message
...


Dave wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:49:17 -0600, "Charles Momsen"

said:


Watch the debate and see.


Do you suppose they'll tell viewers that the moderator has a direct
economic
interest in Obama's winning?


You mean her book that's been on Amazon and the Random House website for
some time? And that was discussed with Howard Kurtz several weeks ago in
the Washington Post? - The one that was ignored by MacCain's staff until
they realized John has been sliding on down in the polls? - Actually,
anyone who has ever watched Ifil couldn't help but recognize her bias for
Obama.

But I agree that she wasn't a good choice. - Not because she will be
unfair to Sarah, but because she may be unfair to Biden. She may think she
has to lean over backwards to avoid any appearance of being too hard on
poor little Sarah, in an effort to show that she has run a fair and
balanced event. Instead, we need a moderator that won't take any crap from
either of the candidates.

Jim


I heard and now believe that Biden can win the debate in the first minute.
He should apologize to her on behalf of all those people who attacked her
personally, her family, etc. I heard this suggestion on NPR, the center of
the great bastion of left-leaning journalists/communists, which includes
Disney/Viacom, News Corp., GE, etc. Oh wait! NPR gets its funding from
actual people!



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com