View Single Post
  #27   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
Dan Dan is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 36
Default I'm a little confused...

Gunner wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:41:23 -0600, "Obama-Biden in 08"
wrote:

And supporting the constitutional right to bear arms,

. . . including the right of convicted felons to posess assault weapons and
terrorists to have bombs.


Cites?

Sounds to me like more loonyleftwinger lies.


No, it is not.

If you admit to having limitations on the "arms" in the 2nd Amendment,
then the only argument is where those limitations are drawn. You have
steadfastly claimed that people have the right to keep and bear ANY arms
without ANY restrictions, therefore his statement makes perfect sense.

Have you changed your position to win an argument, or are you just insane?

The world wonders.

Dan