On Sep 5, 11:30*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message

...



Which has what to do with anything above?

It would be interesting to debate this political issues from another
standpoint.

Forget McCain.
Forget Obama

Forget all names and personalities entirely.

Debate the differences between the moderate Republican and moderate
Democratic philosophies in terms of which is best in this country to achieve
the common goals of individual prosperity, security, health and freedom.

The simplified Republican viewpoint calls for minimum Fed intervention,
encourages growth through lower taxes, and stresses individual reliance,
with social welfare for those not able to take care of themselves.

The simplified Democratic viewpoint stresses reliance on the Fed to provide
for equal benefits and opportunity for all.

Which do you prefer?

Eisboch

The moderate republican has been overshadowed by the right wing nut
job republicans. That's going to be the downfall of the republicans,
they have given in too much to the extreme right.

Overall I think that most of us are for smaller government and minimal
government intervention. But that's not what the republicans have
been delivering for the past decade. It has been the exact opposite.
And that's another problem that is surfacing in the republican party
these days, say one thing but do another.

Where as the democrates have mostly remained moderate. Most americans
want to see some sort of relief for the downtrodden. Many are not in
their predicament entirely because of their own mistakes.

Social issues are seldom simple. Neither are foreign issues. The
evidence of the republican arrogance is their decision making these
days is obvious.