View Single Post
  #89   Report Post  
Jim
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands


"Jim" wrote in message
et...

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
No it wasn't. You tried to hedge your accusation, however, when you said
"Granted, you stopped short of saying that you *did* what you recommend."
Is that what qualifies as a "Gould Apology"?

That wasn't a "hedge", it was a life line. Glad to see you grab it with

such
enthusiasm. One of two things is true, and the least negative is that you

have
recommended other people practice
employment policies that you, yourself, refrain from.

I posed a question. The question was,
"Didn't you post a couple of months ago that you hire part time employees

to
avoid paying fringe benefits?" and you disclaimed any knowledge of ever

making
such a statement.


Before, you were waffling...but now you are lying! Here was my response:

"Go wade through google, Gould. I have never hired a part-time employee to
avoid paying benefits."



You could, at that time, have said, "No, what I have stated
is.........."


Why should I? *You* made the accusation...you provide the proof.


When I dug the statement up, I noted that your only "out" was to
claim that you didn't practice what you preach.


My only "out"? My out was the truth...and the truth is that I do not hire,
and have not hired, part-time employees to avoid paying fringe benefits.


I can't remember the context of the conversation, but I believe he was
trying to argue that it made more sense economically to employ *one*
hygienist for 60 hours per week plus benefits, than employing 2 part-time
people for 30 hours each less benefits.

That's opposite of what you posted.


No it's not. That's Noah's argument you're responding to above...not mine.

You stated it was cheaper to work two
dental workers for 25 hours apiece, without benefits or overtime, than to

pay
one full time worker for 40 hours, plus 10 hours overtime, plus benefits.


And it is!


Regardless, you now say that you don't actually do what you recommend as a
sound employment practice. I commended you for that. Didn't you notice?


Thanks. But it's interesting that you still can't bring yourself to say "I
was wrong, NOYB. You never posted a couple of months ago that you hire
part-time employees in order to avoid paying fringe benefits...so I'm sorry
I falsely accused you".



It will never happen...old Chuck is not man enough to fess up when he is wrong OR

OFFER an
apology when he accuses someone of something they never said/did.

He recently proved he cannot keep his word.

He is a man of dubious character.



Correction made to my previous statement. Yes, I guess I am only human.