wf3h wrote:
On Sep 3, 10:32 am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wf3h wrote:

:On Sep 3, 10:07 am, Fred J. McCall wrote:: wf3h wrote:

:
: :On Sep 2, 10:38 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:: wf3h wrote:
:
: :
: : :
: : :given the suspension of habeas corpus that the bushies have done, ...
: : :
: :
: : What planet was that on?
: :
: : :... and
: : :the routine spying on the US public by the CIA also pushed by bush,
: :
: : Again, you seem to be on another planet.
: :
: :
: :typical right wing nut...believes rush, but not the evidence:
: :
:
: Sorry to disappoint you, dumbass, but I don't listen to Rush (or talk
: radio in general, on either side). Boring. Like you.
:
: :http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/rights...beuscorpus.htm
: :
: :On Oct. 17, 2006, President Bush signed a law suspending the right of
: :habeas corpus to persons "determined by the United States" to be an
: :"enemy combatant" in the Global War on Terror. President Bush's action
: :drew severe criticism, mainly for the law's failure to specifically
: :designate who in the United Stateswill determine who is and who is not
: :an "enemy combatant."
: :
: h. like a typical limbaugh listener you didn't know that.
:
: No, I just don't consider that to be a general "suspension of habeas
: corpus", what with it covering a half dozen or so people.
:
:
h. the constitution has a provision in it that covers everyone but
:the ones you say it doesn't?
:
:wasn't aware of that.
:

You just can't stick to the issue, can you?

Are you always this stupid, or are you making a special effort as the
election draws near?

--

i'm hoping to become a republican.

It is nice of you to always come visit every 2 yrs at election time.
Harry really appreciates it.