hk wrote:
Vincent wrote:
hk wrote:
Vincent wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:28:32 -0400, hk wrote:


Well, I wasn't going to be the one to spill the alleged details.
If it
is true, it is an immediate disqualifier for the woman, not
because of
the act, but because of the basic dishonesty it exhibits.

BS, there are times a lie is justified. This is one of them.
Again, it's their business.


Her daughter is pregnant right now

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100710_pf.html


Vince


Birth control isn't available in Alaska?

not for the right wing evangelicals, they rely on abstinence
education, until they become grandparents



Vince


Well, I hope the girl is treated more kindly by the media than Jamie
Lynn Spears was. I also hope she was at least 16 when she had
intercourse, assuming 16 is the age of consent in Alaska.

Ah, yes...abstinence education, about as realistic as, say, creationism.

The girl deserves proper treatment and privacy

Remember this woman was picked to appeal to the evangelical family
values anti sex anti abortion crowd

the 2004 gop platform was clearly in the "keep em stupid " version of
sex education

"Therefore, we support doubling abstinence education funding. We oppose
school-based clinics that provide referrals, counseling, and related
services for contraception and abortion."

The republicans make teen pregnancies a political issue


The failure by her mother to promptly disclose and the poor judgment
shown by McCain in thinking this could be kept secret are very and
reasonably troubling


Vince