"hk" wrote in message
. com...

Eisboch wrote:


Sure. Right. A method to control women......

It has absolutely nothing to do with the rights of the unborn child, does
it?

Eisboch



What rights?

Roe v. Wade states that abortions are permissible for any reason, up until
the point a fetus becomes viable, which means potentially able to live
outside a mother's womb. Viability typically takes place somewhere between
24 and 28 weeks. Abortion is also available after viability when necessary
to protect a woman's health.



That's a legal opinion. It's not a personal opinion based on moral or
religious beliefs.
In this country, one is entitled to them as well.

I have no problem with a legally defined standard of pro-choice.
I *do* have a problem with those who like to pass judgment on the choices
made, trying to affect future decisions of others, or attempting to
undermine a person's credibility/morality to the furtherment of *their*
beliefs or political agendas.

Which, BTW, is exactly what you do.

In my case, I happen to believe that life begins at conception. It's not a
religious based opinion. It's a personal opinion, based on the fact that
life itself begets life. But, I don't push that on others unless they
happen to ask, or the subject comes up in a general discussion.

Eisboch