Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

You seem to have it completely wrong. While I disapprove of Palin
continuing her late in life pregnancy* once she knew she was going to have
a baby with "problems," I'd not want to do anything to prevent her from
going full term. Her choice. I'm not pushing my beliefs at her.



No. You simply indicated that she was selfish, irresponsible and should
have aborted the child, amoung other things.

That's not pushing your beliefs?

Of course not. If I were "pushing" my beliefs, I'd be actively seeking
judicial or legislative solutions, or attacking anti-abortion protesters.

I don't give a damn if the righties want to tell us how awful abortion
is, or how wonderful Jesus is, or whatever, so long as they do it from a
private soapbox or a pulpit, and don't try to push their agenda through
the courts or legislation.

I'm entitled to present my opinion about her pregnancy. I'm not entitled
to make her conform to my opinion.

Is that simple enough?




You know Harry, you often claim to be misunderstood, or that others miss
your points.

You, more than most, should realize that the art of communication is
two-sided.
You a responsibility to accurately and clearly state your views so that
others have a reasonable chance of interpreting them properly. In a forum
like this, that responsibility extends across a broad range of readers.

You seem to discard anyone who doesn't "get it" as being less intelligent,
being poorly educated, or otherwise inferior to your self granted and
percieved lofty intellect.

That's not an indication of intelligence. It's a confirmation of
arrogance.

Eisboch

Do you get it now?

Did I make it simple enough?

:}