Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


In my heart, I believe the anti-abortionists are that way because of
psychological, rather than religious reasons, anyway. It is a
patriarchal belief, even though some women share in it. It is a method
to control women.

Sure. Right. A method to control women......

It has absolutely nothing to do with the rights of the unborn child, does
it?

Eisboch

Ahh...the Fetus Rights Movement, a division of the Fundamentalist Borg
Church, no doubt.


You are truly unbelievable. On one hand you are for freedom of expression,
thought and to a degree, deed.
But on the other, all above is subject to your approval and beliefs. Those
that don't subscribe are lacking in intelligence,
rightwing religious nut cases, schitt heads or dumbfochs.

Do you have any idea of how narrow minded you are?

Eisboch




You seem to have it completely wrong. While I disapprove of Palin
continuing her late in life pregnancy* once she knew she was going to
have a baby with "problems," I'd not want to do anything to prevent her
from going full term. Her choice. I'm not pushing my beliefs at her.

What she and McBush want to do is take that "choice" away from women
who think otherwise. They, not I, want to dictate their approval and
beliefs on women.

Big difference.

And the difference carries over to my feelings about religion, too. So
long as you are not hurting anyone, I don't care what religion you
practice in your house of worship, in your home, or in your privately
funded school. That's your choice. But don't try to shove those
religious beliefs in my face, via legislation, judicial decisions, or
signing statements.



* BTW, there is a very interesting and juicy rumor floating about
regarding Ms. Palin and that pregnancy. It's too salacious for even me
to repeat it here or discuss it before the story breaks.