On Aug 31, 9:22*pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 31, 9:12 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 31, 7:34 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 31, 5:49 pm, hk wrote:
The nicest thing about the Palin pick is that most voters capable of
thinking don’t even have to think twice about her to know they oppose
her, because she is a *religiousnutjob.
There's no reason to toleratereligiousnutjobb.s. Think evolution is
“just a theory,” you are not getting my vote. Think abortion should be
illegal no matter what, even in cases of rape and incest, you're not
getting my vote. Think intelligent design should be taught in science
classrooms, you're not getting my vote.
So most thinking voters, at least, *won't *have to even bother with the
issues of experience and her complete lack of knowledge regarding
foreign affairs and well, hell, the fact she didn’t even know what the
VP did a few weeks ago. They don’t have to think about any of that, as
her extremereligiousviews already disqualify her. *No more social
conservatives in the White House or next to it, ever
then again, Harry. There are some of us that are thinking voters, who
also happen to be religious nut-jobs, that actually like those
qualities in a POTUS candidate.
The United States is not a theocracy, not yet, though it McCain and
Palin are, it will become one.
It never has been a theocracy and never will be one. There's where the
mis-interpreted separatation of church and state actually comes in.
That no specific religion will dominate the govt. that is
constitutional.
Religious beliefs have no place in government policy. I don't give a
damn what your personal beliefs are, so long as you don't try to shove
them at me. Unfortunately, that is *just* what the righties do...they
want everyone to become a JesusBorg...like they are.
Harry, I'm a so- called "rightie" *.I never have shoved religion at
you or anyone else here that I know of.
Thinking voters do not believe evolution is just a theory, or that
intelligent design belongs in public schools. Intelligent design is
nothing more than religious voodoo bull****
Not necessarily Harry. *Especially when you look at evolution. Even
Darwin was amazed how people took his "theories" and ran with them...
I happen o believe in Creationalism, and certain evolution, and The
creationalist thought really and basically "Well, somebody had to do
it"
Why does Creationalism, and/or evolution always have to be right or
wrong?
There's no science behind creationism.

Go ahead, prove creationism. Prove there is a creator.

Make my day.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dont' have to. I dont' have to satisfy you, my friend. I have to
satisfy my own concience and faith.

Hey, you can believe whatever you want, religiously. Just don't try to
shovel your religious beliefs onto me or have your candidates, if
elected, make your religious beliefs part of the laws of my country, eh?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

harry, I think I've already explained that, eh?