On Aug 30, 12:14 am, "CalifBill" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:47:16 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 29, 7:24 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 29, 6:50 pm, hk wrote:
...and health are now issues *on* the table.
Guaranteed.
A 72-year-old man who has had four bouts with cancer...
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/05/23...ealth.records/
And?
Means absolutely nothing. He could also get hit by one of his wife's
beer
trucks the day after the inauguration.
The POTUS has a responsibility to select a qualified VP, ready to step
in
should the need arise.
McCain didn't do that. He selected someone who might make him more
electable, that's all.
I admire the achievements to date of Sarah Whateverhernameis .... but I
am
very disappointed in the reasoning of McCain in selecting her. She
simply
is not qualified.
Eisboch
And Obama is more qualified..........how?
Did you know of Obama and his experience and experience before
speculation of his campaign for POTUS started?
BTW: *She* is not at the top of the ticket.
====================================
If I may jump in, it's not that Obama is qualified, it that Ms. Palin is
not.
Huh?
The R VP delegate is more qualified for the POTUS than the D POTUS is.
Explain how I am wrong.
No need to...it is patently obvious.
Actually is not obvious at all. Obama has no, zero, nada executive
experience. What little he had running the Annenberg challenge for schools
in Chicago shows how little competency he has. Mrs. Palin ran a 9500 person
city, Verty well from what I understand. Served on a major natural
resources board and got 2 people tossed for ethics violations. Ran a
fiscally conservative and successful first 2 years of a governorship. Was a
CPA so does know finances. Is a major problem in this country, one of the
most pressing, the excess spending by Congress. You explain how much better
Obama and Biden are.
It is very clear that Palin is more qualified than either Biden or
lightweight Obama.